Thursday, January 17, 2008

Yezzaa, Lingam?

We must give it to Mr V. K Lingam of that Lingam video clip. And we can all learn something from him if we're ever caught in a similar situation.
You know, not actually denying, but no, no...not admitting at all.

That man that looks like him and sounds --"correct, correct, correct" -- like him...in that contentious clip, was just that.

From the Sun:

Commission member Datuk Mahadev Shankar asked Lingam's lawyer, R. Thayalan, if Lingam admitted it was him who appeared in the clip.
"Is it your position that your client is not him in the clip?" asked Mahadev.
"He said it looks and sounds like him in the clip," replied Thayalan.
Mahadev pressed Thayalan further and asked if Lingam admitted the details which appeared in the transcript was uttered by Lingam.
"I have to take instructions from him, but his stand now is that it looks and sounds like him," replied Thayalan.

13 comments:

  1. Anonymous10:04 AM

    "not actually denying, but no,no...not admitting at all.".

    Like that one ah?

    Aiyahh, we call that "loyar buruk."

    Can aah?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lingam definately will go in the Malaysian Hall of Fame.

    Check out the list I am trying to build to come up with the top 10.

    http://kecet.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous10:37 AM

    Why is he (Lingam) beating around the bush?

    Be man enough and admit-lah!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous10:47 AM

    ....Looks like ular...move like ular...but thats not an ular la...

    ....thaatts Lingam......hahahhaha

    jangan mareh..

    ReplyDelete
  5. Beginning from day one, this lingam affair has been steadily descending from the sublime to the ridiculous.

    And our august Commission and its jolly members are just another chapter in the parody. Reminds me of some of the episodes in Crown Court, a '70s TV series. I won't be surprised if a variation of the following actually occurs one fine day during the hearings:

    ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
    WITNESS: No.
    ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
    WITNESS: No.
    ATTORNEY Did you check for breathing?
    WITNESS: No.
    ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
    WITNESS: No.
    ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
    WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
    ATTORNEY: But could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
    WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12:56 PM

    If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and swims like a duck, then what else can it be?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kak Nuraina,
    If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck.
    It's a duck.
    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous3:05 PM

    And Mahadev said something to this effect "you are making our lives so difficult!"

    Good on Mahadev!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Right now, Chua Soi Lek and Vijandran are banging their head and screaming at their lawyers, "why dont you think of that?"

    And suddenly all the cctv's are obsolete even before I submit my tender. Darn!

    Why not just throw the guy in jail and if he object, just tell him that you are just jailing someone who look and sound like him but not necessarily him.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous5:01 PM

    Hahahaha yesssss... our very own minister turns pornstar must've been furiously banging his head over this remark made by the Linggam Sos.

    ReplyDelete
  11. u got to LOVE the answers given in a court of law !!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey Aina

    Just stumbled on yr blog.....while doing nothing (actually while working)
    Remember me????

    Pek-Bee (Helen)
    :)) been a looooong time

    ReplyDelete
  13. helen ting pek bee,'

    of course i remember you!! we classmates, in standard 5 & 6...form one?

    how are you? and where are you?

    do keep in touch!

    ReplyDelete